Thanks. Apology. Correction. Tips Update. Old Friends. IT Allies.

And when you are a hammer...

Monday.

Thank you. I am overwhelmed by the voluminous and mostly positive, communications coming in from many sources.  

For those in the not positive. Cool.  No matter where you go, there you are.  

I am also humbled, and a bit surprised by dozens of people subscribing to this Substack.   When I first posted, I got a few somewhat baffled (and one borderline angry) response from people that I did not have a way to subscribe.  So I spent an hour enabling subscriber functions.  

Honestly, I doubted anyone would actually subscribe, but I am always curious about how financial functionality features online work, and enjoy testing them.  

Boy howdy.  I was wrong.  Boggled by the response.  My humble apologies and I will do my best to return value to those who have subscribed.   Thanks. For the duration of ballot bounty hunting, I will post everything in the open. When we close this effort, I will put some thought into value stacks.

Second.   I was also wrong to have used the term Bullet Ballots in my DTW letter.  I apologize. Again. The urgency to warn in Cyber is real.  If you wait on an exfiltration, you lose. Unfortunately the Bullet Ballot hypothesis has caused a lot of discord and distraction. Been trying to clean that up in postings and now on multiple radio programs.   They may be a part of the issue, but it is very clear a very large set of irregularities exists in this election.  In the light of my past-experiences, the use of bomb-threats against tabulation centers, and the shocking number of states declaring Trump won outside recount levels, while the downballot Democrats won also outside of recount levels remains in my view outside of believability. But it appears something other than Bullet Ballots is at play.  Drop that line of thinking.  The undervotes, tabulator code access, reasons for bomb threats all remain. And my tips line is showing more lines of concern to be covered below.

With the near completion of ballot counting, I find the results being certified more absurd not less.  When I wrote my DTW letter Trump had 52% of the popular vote, and a 3.5% lead, yet was being declared the winner of 7 out of 7 states all outside the margin for recount even the states he trailed in the exit polling.   As of this writing he has 49.8% to Harris’ 48.4%.   And while her margin of win in all 7 swing states has narrowed, it remains outside the margin for recount in all seven.     A perfect and bespoke outcome, perfectly tailored to shut down any substantive legal challenge which would access the paper ballots underneath.

This laughably unlikely outcome, and the numerous other issues have brought a growing number of IT leaders out to call “Uhm. Nope.”    Several dozen additional names demanding hand recounts,  IT audits and security breaches in tabulation machines.  Notable among them Jackie Singh @hackingbutlegal.bsky.social. She worked for Biden and Harris.   And yes, I have now been sent the sections of Ms. Harris 2019 book in which she herself expresses concern about our election security.   Perhaps send her concerns to her, not me.

BALLOT BOUNTY TIPS

As of this morning no one has come forward with a tip, or turn-in in these four areas I am most interested in.  

1 - Who managed the data from the millions of names and street addresses submitted to Elon’s $1M lottery, and did - as I am nearly certain - build a parallel private poll book of pledged trump supporters organized by local precinct.  Did the list have realtime update functionality against ePollBooks, either pull or push.

2 - Who did analysis of ESS and Dominion Tabulation software (at any level of the stack) and made vulnerability lists and/or wrote exploits against those lists.

3 - Who built the real time turnout estimation app attributed to Elon, and what was it’s functionality, what real time voter turnout access did it have, in what states and which voter profiling system was it connected with.   I am pretty sure it’s an extension of the lottery built system detailed in target #1.

4 - If you were in a tabulation center during a bomb-threat, who stayed behind and who left?   And was there a functionality change in the system before and after

But I have reviewed a number of, detailed information submissions from VICTIMS that fit into these categories of concern.

1 - People who were purged and in some cases have long lists of purged names which includes them.  I don’t know who is compiling the scope and scale of this issue, but there are some very angry people prevented from voting for this reason.

2 - People who voted by mail, got confirmation their ballot was received, but their ballot is not marked as counted OR in some cases, their registration is now missing.  They appear to have been registered and issued a ballot, then purged after they voted.   Again, I don’t know the scale of this but some people have submitted very detailed screenshots.

3 - “3% Shave” using ESS Tabulation Machines.   We have a lot of “Math can’t be right tips” one tip with a strangely specific vote-swap formula has been claimed to effect three different places.  

The claim is, the 2024 totals for Trump are inflated by adding 3% of Biden's 2020 number plus another 3% of 2020's total vote, and then reducing Harris by that same total.   Here is Math from the Tip making this claim regarding Webb County Tx.  (Note:  Webb County has only voted Democratic since 1912). 

2020:    Trump: 25898 (38.24%)

       Biden: 41820 (61.76%)

   Total: 67718

Claimed shave number calculation:    

3% of Biden's Vote: 1254.6 +  3% of 2020 Total Vote: 2031.54 = Shave Number.

2024     Trump: 33374 (51.10%)   (Shave added)

      Harris: 31934  (48.90%)   (Shave reduced)

    Total: 65308

Take the claimed Shave off and the result in Webb County would have been:

Harris: 35220 (53.93%)

Trump: 30088 (46.07%)

Turnout is the same either way:  65308.   

In Webb County TX local Democratic leaders do seem to have precinct level understanding of their County and voter knowledge of the local community in minute detail. The tipster reports their internal numbers expected a Harris +8 result.   Totals over 10% off from detailed local knowledge is pretty odd.

If you know a particular county in detail, and have an equally head-scratching result could you determine if the same swap formula matches your published results vs. expected. This is a weirdly specific tip, claimed to impact three different places.

4th and Last  -  iPAD doorbell knocking groups who claimed you could either register or if a person was already registered claimed they could CAST their vote on the door knocker’s iPAD.   We don’t need any tips of people who heard about this or something similar.  We got enough to mean it was real, BUT if you or someone you know participated in building or running the backend of this, that would be tip I would very much like to see.